Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Erm, Microsoft lost it’s dominance in part because it too lost an anti-trust case. Are you saying you wish Microsoft had been powerful enough to stifle Google the way Google is now powerful enough to stifle its competitors? What’s another 15 years?


Microsoft lost because they lost mobile to apple and google because they released better products, same thing for bing etc. Not because of anti-trust.


Nope. Microsoft was forced to discontinue its anti-competitive bundling tactics, which they otherwise would have used to throttle competition as they did with Netscape.

For that matter, Apple only exists today because of Microsoft’s investment, which was in part done only to keep their competitor alive so that they could claim not to have a complete monopoly.

Apple and Google’s products certainly were better, but they would have been crushed by anti-competitive practices if Microsoft had not already lost their antitrust case.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: