If you read the actual opinion (which I recommend, it's very interesting), placing the tracking device on the vehicle's undercarriage is actually trespass:
"It is important to be clear about what occurred in this
case: The Government physically occupied private property for the purpose of obtaining information. We have no
doubt that such a physical intrusion would have been
considered a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth
Amendment when it was adopted." (page 4 of the opinion, 6 of the pdf)
"It is important to be clear about what occurred in this case: The Government physically occupied private property for the purpose of obtaining information. We have no doubt that such a physical intrusion would have been considered a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when it was adopted." (page 4 of the opinion, 6 of the pdf)
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf